README: Update non experimental key words from RFC 2119 to RFC 8174
While both RFC 2119 and RFC 8174 are considered best current practise by BCP 14, this document is compliant with the more strict RFC 8174 already.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c02cd7f62e
commit
65ccb4bc16
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Hi I'm networkException
|
||||
|
||||
> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT" "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119.html).
|
||||
> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [BCP 14](https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14) [[RFC2119]](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119) [[RFC8174]](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
|
||||
|
||||
> The key words "MUST (BUT WE KNOW YOU WON'T)", "SHOULD CONSIDER", "REALLY SHOULD NOT", "OUGHT TO", "WOULD PROBABLY", "MAY WISH TO", "COULD", "POSSIBLE", and "MIGHT" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 6919](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6919.html).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue