From 65ccb4bc16e2fa35a91921b2023d3daac72e3dd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: networkException Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:50:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] README: Update non experimental key words from RFC 2119 to RFC 8174 While both RFC 2119 and RFC 8174 are considered best current practise by BCP 14, this document is compliant with the more strict RFC 8174 already. --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 6303e58..4277e37 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Hi I'm networkException -> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT" "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119.html). +> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [BCP 14](https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14) [[RFC2119]](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119) [[RFC8174]](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. > The key words "MUST (BUT WE KNOW YOU WON'T)", "SHOULD CONSIDER", "REALLY SHOULD NOT", "OUGHT TO", "WOULD PROBABLY", "MAY WISH TO", "COULD", "POSSIBLE", and "MIGHT" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 6919](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6919.html).